North Korea Increases Aid to Russia, Mos... Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:29 | Marko Marjanovi?
Trump Assembles a War Cabinet Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?
Slavgrinder Ramps Up Into Overdrive Tue Nov 12, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?
?Existential? Culling to Continue on Com... Mon Nov 11, 2024 10:28 | Marko Marjanovi?
US to Deploy Military Contractors to Ukr... Sun Nov 10, 2024 02:37 | Field Empty
Anti-Empire >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
News Round-Up Tue Jul 22, 2025 00:24 | Richard Eldred
A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
The College Stasi Files Mon Jul 21, 2025 19:07 | Michael Rainsborough
After King's College London forced out Michael Rainsborough, emails emerged stating that he needed to be "brought to heel" owing to his "unique perspectives". Does anything more clearly show the fall of the university?
The post The College Stasi Files appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Farage Pledges to Send Britain?s Worst Criminals to El Salvador Mon Jul 21, 2025 17:30 | Will Jones
Nigel Farage has pledged to send Britain's worst offenders to jail in El Salvador as part of a five-year plan to halve crime rates that would involve leaving the European Convention on Human Rights.
The post Farage Pledges to Send Britain’s Worst Criminals to El Salvador appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
World Economic Forum?s Klaus Schwab ?Rigged Data? to Make Brexit Look Like Failure Mon Jul 21, 2025 15:14 | Will Jones
The World Economic Forum's Klaus Schwab has been accused of rigging research to make Brexit look like a failure, intervening in the WEF?s annual Global Competitiveness Report to push the UK down the rankings.
The post World Economic Forum’s Klaus Schwab “Rigged Data” to Make Brexit Look Like Failure appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Afghan Debacle in Camden Mon Jul 21, 2025 13:00 | Anonymous Local
A much-loved community centre in Camden was demolished and turned into a "ghetto" to house asylum seekers from Afghanistan, enraging locals. It?s a snapshot of how appallingly Britain is now governed.
The post Afghan Debacle in Camden appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Will intergovernmental institutions withstand the end of the "American Empire"?,... Sat Apr 05, 2025 07:15 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?127 Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:38 | en
Disintegration of Western democracy begins in France Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:00 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?126 Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:39 | en
The International Conference on Combating Anti-Semitism by Amichai Chikli and Na... Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:31 | en
Voltaire Network >>
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (4 of 4)
Jump To Comment: 4 3 2 1joe, thanks for this post. The first poster who posts about ad hominem in an ad hominem post without a trace of irony is likely the notorious poster "real scientist" in disguise. I'd just ignore him. I'd estimate the large volume of hot air he generates on this site is increasing global warming significantly! ;-)
That’s correct Opus .The article is about the anti-science Heartland Institute, and not the details of climate science research as such. The.Heartland Institute currently says on its website that individuals who have commented on the leaked documents without waiting for the Institute to confirm or deny their authenticity have committed civil and possibly criminal offenses for which Heartland “plans to pursue charges and collect payment for damages, including damages to our reputation”.
Or ad tink-tank maybe. Ad hominem means to the person. Unless you are crediting the institution with legal personality, a bit of an unscientific extension even still.
And he does give extracts backing the post, which is about the institute, not climate science as such. To this casual scanner it seems you have an agenda of your own here.
In fact, you could be accused of an ad hominem response. The very slant of you label is personal.
You say that this institute produces "anti-scientific propaganda" but you don't give even one example of this. This is all about attacking the institute and it's method of funding itself. It must seem to the casual reader, as it does to me, that you cannot question any of the "anti-scientific propaganda" and have instead decided to engage in an ad hominem attack.