Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony Public Inquiry >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
A Closer Look at ARIA: Britain?s Secretive ?800 Million Sun-Dimming Quango Tue May 13, 2025 09:00 | Tilak Doshi Dr Tilak Doshi takes a closer look at ARIA, Britain's secretive ?800 million quango that would dim the sun to 'save us' from global warming. Aside from the nutty Net Zero-ism, do governments ever pick winners? he asks.
The post A Closer Look at ARIA: Britain’s Secretive ?800 Million Sun-Dimming Quango appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Did Keir Starmer Just Say He Will ?Take Back Control?? Tue May 13, 2025 07:00 | James Alexander Nigel Farage doesn't need to win the next election to be in power, says Prof James Alexander. Starmer is already announcing his immigration policies. But will the Labour PM really follow through and 'Take Back Control'?
The post Did Keir Starmer Just Say He Will ‘Take Back Control’? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
News Round-Up Tue May 13, 2025 00:51 | Richard Eldred A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Disney Re-Releases Snow White ? and it Bombs Even Worse Than the First Time Mon May 12, 2025 19:00 | Will Jones Not content with the new Snow White bombing in March, Disney decided to release it again in the US last week, only for it to bomb even worse than the first time and take just $252 per screen.
The post Disney Re-Releases Snow White ? and it Bombs Even Worse Than the First Time appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
NatWest Customer Offended by Pride Flags Told to Bank Online Mon May 12, 2025 17:00 | Will Jones A NatWest customer who complained about an LGBT Pride campaign at his local branch was told to bank online ? and the ombudsman agreed.
The post NatWest Customer Offended by Pride Flags Told to Bank Online appeared first on The Daily Sceptic. Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Will intergovernmental institutions withstand the end of the "American Empire"?,... Sat Apr 05, 2025 07:15 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?127 Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:38 | en
Disintegration of Western democracy begins in France Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:00 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?126 Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:39 | en
The International Conference on Combating Anti-Semitism by Amichai Chikli and Na... Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:31 | en Voltaire Network >>
|
Does Alan Shatter have anything to hide?
international |
crime and justice |
news report
Monday October 31, 2011 19:48 by PAW - People's Association Watchdog

Does MINISTER for JUSTICE Alan Shatter really want secrecy to surround the costs involved in Family Law Cases? Does he Have a reason to want Solicitors to have a wall of protection around them when desperate families could be getting swindled at the hands of a corrupt member of the Law Society? MINISTER for Justice Alan Shatter is pushing for his Legal Services Regulation Bill to be passed into law, which could enable a cloak of secrecy to mask possible wrong doing by rogue elements of the Law Society by preventing adjudications on costs from being published in cases of family law. At first glance the bill appears to be nothing more that a reinforcement of the right to privacy that a family should have during a probably traumatic time, however one cannot help but notice the inclusion of Section 82.3 which states: “determinations of the legal costs adjudicator,
containing the outcomes of disputes and the reasons for the decision,
will be published, unless the dispute concerns proceedings heard
otherwise than in public, or proceedings that, had they gone to a
hearing would have been heard otherwise than in public.” But doesn't this cover all family court proceedings which are heard in camera??? This writer has reservations with this bill being introduced into law, firstly, it does nothing to protect the family / client, it serves to raise the possibility of dispute more readily due to the secrecy and protection afforded the Solicitor, it enshrines the Law Society as a "Secret Society", it leaves distraught and traumatized wide open to be overcharged by any unscrupulous lawyers that may be more than willing to take advantage of a person at a what might be a very vulnerable time for them. Minister for Justice ALAN SHATTER should appreciate that more than most as he worked for a very large law firm before becoming a minister, a law firm that specialized in FAMILY LAW, furthermore, that very same law firm has plenty of experience with disputes about costs with their clients having been subject to a number of said disputes. So the Writer asks the question..... Does MINISTER for JUSTICE Alan Shatter really want secrecy to surround the costs involved in Family Law Cases? Does he Have a reason to want Solicitors to have a wall of protection around them when desperate families could be getting swindled at the hands of a corrupt member of the Law Society?
|